Part 11. Nash Equilibrium (4) – Correlation between Nash Equilibrium and Public Goods
At the last post, we saw the important correlation between Nash Equilibrium and Guaranteed The Lowest Price. However, Nash Equilibrium has various examples. Today, I introduce another correlation which is the relationship between Nash Equilibrium and Public Goods.
Before starting this relationship, what is the meaning of public goods? A dictionary meaning of “public goods” is “services such as national defence, law enforcement, and road building, that are for the benefit of, andavailable to, all members of the public.” Most of the free highways, ordinary roads (except toll roads), air (oxygen) and so on. Unlike the United States, public goods of the other countries, which do not privatize public goods services, include water supply and drainage services, electricity and railroad systems.
The major features of public goods are that all people can use public goods, nobody can restrict using public goods, and most of the people want to use public goods, but they do not want to pay expenses.
Two towns, whose names are Santa and Claus, are planning to build the free four-lane road that connects these two towns. The residents of two towns have to spend three hours on the road to go to the other town because the current road is unpaved and very narrow.
However, the federal government and the state government refused to support the cost of the construction because the federal and state parliament cut the budget to fund this construction. For this reason, the residents of the two towns decided to build their four-lane free road without funds of the federal and state government. The inhabitant of Town Santa is richer than those of Town Claus because Town Santa has car and cement factories.
The total expense of the construction is five million dollars. The richer town, Town Santa, can pay until four million dollars (the maximum). Also, the other town, Town Claus, can absorb until two million dollars (the maximum). However, two towns conflict with the expense because it is too much a big burden to two towns.
If they do not build the road, the benefit will be 0 (zero). If they agree to build the road and share the expense, Town Santa will pay K amount of the expense, and that of Town Claus will burden 5 million-K amount of that. If only one town agree to build the road, the town will pay all of the expense.
This is a grid of their benefits of this construction.
Town Claus
Town Santa |
Joining the construction | Not Joining |
Joining the construction | (4M-K, K-M) | (-1M, 2M) |
Not Joining | (4M, -3M) | (0,0) |
(*M means a million dollar)
According to this grid, K is bigger than 0 (zero), but is smaller than 5 million dollars. Therefore, the best way to get maximum benefit is “Not Joining to the construction.” Two towns select strategic dominance, so the residents of two towns cannot use a four-line well-made paved road.